For occupational health teams, HR Directors, and broker partners who want to know what sits underneath the protocol. This page describes the behavioural mechanism PRC operates on, the established research it draws from, and the specific boundaries of what it does and does not do.
Most behavioural patterns that erode professional output are not decisions. They are automatic responses to specific triggers, running below conscious deliberation. Once mapped at this level, they become operational data. Operational data is something you can redesign.
PRC draws on three established behavioural-science traditions: cognitive-behavioural theory (the cognitive content underneath an automatic response), behavioural-activation research (the environmental and contextual conditions that produce the response), and habit-formation research (the cue-routine-outcome structure that maintains it). The protocol does not deliver therapy. It applies the mechanism these traditions describe to a structured 90-day operational sequence.
Each pillar of the protocol corresponds to a specific established phase of behavioural change. The behavioural research it draws on is widely established. The application is structural, sequenced, and operational.
Invisible losses made visible. The participant produces a documented cost record: hours lost, decisions deferred, output reworked. The pattern that was operating below awareness is now operational data the participant can act on.
The participant runs through a structured 30-day mapping sequence. The output is not a diary. It is a documented sequence: trigger conditions, the 90 minutes preceding the default response, the response itself, and the operational cost over the following 24 to 72 hours.
This sequence draws on functional analysis (Beck, 1979; Padesky and Mooney, 1990) and behavioural chain analysis (Linehan, 1993). PRC uses the structural logic of these frameworks, not the therapeutic infrastructure.
Hours recovered, decisions streamlined. The trigger conditions are structurally reduced. The participant stops expending energy resisting the default and starts operating with lower friction. Day 30 PRC Index assessment tracks the change.
By Day 30 the trigger conditions are documented. Pillar 2 changes those conditions so the default response has less material to work on. This is structural, not motivational. The participant does not need to want to change. They need to change what feeds the default.
Wood and Neal (2007) demonstrated that habits are predicted by context more reliably than by intention. Wood, Tam and Witt (2005) showed that context disruption (relocation, role change, environmental restructuring) reliably reduces previously automatic behaviour. The protocol applies this experimentally validated finding as a structured 30-day redesign sequence.
The operational gain runs permanently, without ongoing input. A replacement default is installed that operates automatically under the same conditions that previously triggered the loss. The protocol ends. The gain continues.
The final 30 days install a deliberate replacement response that runs automatically under the same conditions that previously produced the default. This uses implementation-intention research (Gollwitzer): pre-loaded if-then plans tied to specific cues, which over repeated exposure become automatic.
Gollwitzer (1999) showed that implementation intentions (if-then plans tied to specific cues) reliably increase goal-directed behaviour. Lally et al. (2010) found that automaticity formation typically requires 66 days on average, with a range from 18 to 254 days. PRC's 90-day protocol sits inside this evidence band. Trenz and Keith (2024) demonstrated in a peer-reviewed workplace study that implementation intention protocols, if/then plans anchored to specific situational cues, produce direct habit formation in occupational settings. PRC applies the same principle: a fixed sequence of if/then constructions, run to completion, installs the replacement behaviour automatically.
The mapping above describes a real and well-established mechanism. The translation into PRC is structural, not therapeutic. The distinction matters legally and operationally.
PRC is a structured 90-day operational protocol that applies established behavioural-change mechanisms to professional performance patterns. It is delivered via email and self-directed worksheets. It does not require disclosure of what the participant is addressing, because the mechanism operates on the structure of the response, not the content of the trigger.
If a clinical concern surfaces during the protocol, the participant stops the protocol, accesses appropriate clinical support, and the seat is held at no cost with no restart penalty. The off-ramp is structural, not discretionary.
The full scope of practice statement is at prcworkforce.com/disclosures.html.
Jon takes every first call personally. 30 minutes. No obligation.
Book a Call with Jon